Evidence reviewed through . Price records retain their own observation dates and conditions.View sourcesMethodology and dataset
SEKA ExAero / ExAero RDC
- Category
- Aero road
- Profile status
- Research profile
- Frame
- T1100/M46J-claimed carbon with one-piece molding, fully internal routing and UDH
- Frame weight
- 820 g
- Frame weight basis
- RDC, size 54, unpainted, excluding paint and metal hardware, ±35 g; standard frame is 935 g on the same basis
- Bottom bracket
- BSA 68 threaded
820 g frame with 32 mm tire clearance
SEKA ExAero / ExAero RDC. A new purpose-built aero road platform with an 820 g RDC frame claim, a 935 g standard frame, unusually broad cockpit sizing and a documented 6.67 kg owner build.
The displayed Est. ¥17,900 estimate adds the adjustable ¥6,000 build allowance to the recorded ¥11,900 frame package price.
Specifications and evidence
- Product type
- Frame estimate
- Category
- Aero road
- Evidence maturity
- Research profile
- Price basis
- Frame package ¥11,900 · Observed · 2026-08-14
- Frame
- T1100/M46J-claimed carbon with one-piece molding, fully internal routing and UDH
- Frame weight
- 820 g
- Frame weight basis
- RDC, size 54, unpainted, excluding paint and metal hardware, ±35 g; standard frame is 935 g on the same basis
- Bottom bracket
- BSA 68 threaded
- Derailleur hanger
- UDH
- Tire clearance
- 32 mm
- Sizes
- 44, 49, 52, 54, 56, 58 and 61; official chainstays are 408 mm across the range
- Cockpit
- Gladius standard or ALTA +25 mm, each offered in 19 combinations; MAG aero bottles are sold separately
- Stiffness evidence
- Manufacturer comparative structural claims reproduced by a current specialist retailer: versus SEKA Spear, front lateral stiffness +21.2%, rear lateral stiffness +7.6%, and overall torsional stiffness +13.4% (367 to 416). Test protocol and units are undisclosed; not independent lab evidence.
This is the 32 mm road ExAero generation, not ExAero GR. Current exact-model evidence supports 820 g RDC and 935 g standard size-54 frame claims, BSA 68, UDH and seven sizes. Manufacturer comparative claims report +21.2% front lateral, +7.6% rear lateral and +13.4% overall torsional stiffness versus Spear, without a disclosed protocol.
Buying context
Before buying, verify Exact mainland package and price mapping for standard versus RDC; Full numeric seven-size geometry transcription; Current mainland checkout, delivery and warranty handling for each trim.
About SEKA
Premium Chinese performance brand with sophisticated aero designs; public factory-ownership evidence is limited.
Visit the official SEKA websitePrice record and sources
These sources support this model page; individual claims retain the confidence of their cited source.
Exact current road-model page supports 820 g RDC and 935 g standard size-54 unpainted frame claims, each ±35 g and excluding paint/metal hardware; 32 mm tire clearance; BSA 68; UDH; seven sizes with 408 mm chainstays; Gladius/ALTA cockpit options; separate MAG bottles; and manufacturer CFD/wind-tunnel claims. It is distinct from ExAero GR.
Exact road-model post reports an 820 g frame, T1100/M46J carbon, one-piece molding, seven race-oriented sizes and Gladius or ALTA cockpit options. The current official product page independently matches these specifications. When referenced by an ExAero GR record, this is rejection/disambiguation evidence only and supports no GR specification.
Exact-model public launch headline reports a ¥11,900 starting frameset price and 820 g. The body distinguishes the standard frame from the Wind Eye-equipped RDC trim, so the price is not mapped to the 820 g RDC package. Captured in a locally validated immutable XHS archive; no private metadata is retained.
Exact ExAero RDC size-52 owner build reports 6.67 kg with 60 mm wheels, 50/34 chainrings, 11–34 cassette, 160/140 mm rotors and other listed custom components. This supports realistic build potential, not a factory complete-bike weight. Captured in a locally validated immutable XHS archive; no personal metadata is retained.
A public unboxing post confirms exact-model presence and ownership context. It does not establish price, specification, generation or factory build.
Current exact-model specialist page reports manufacturer comparative figures versus Spear: front lateral stiffness +21.2%, rear lateral stiffness +7.6%, and overall torsional stiffness +13.4%, from 367 to 416. Test protocol and units for the 367/416 values are not disclosed, so these are manufacturer comparative claims rather than independent measurements.